<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>0161 832 6131</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:29:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Leaked Tory Report Suggests Unfair Dismissal May Be Scrapped by Tom Burroughes</title>
		<link>http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/2011/10/26/leaked-tory-report-suggest-unfair-dismissal-may-be-scrapped/comment-page-1/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Burroughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/?p=1024#comment-872</guid>
		<description>I just cannot see how the laws would be scrapped in their entirety; what is needed is a bit of a reform to avoid decent people being summarily dismissed and having their work reputations trashed, while making sure that lazy people don&#039;t exploit the rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just cannot see how the laws would be scrapped in their entirety; what is needed is a bit of a reform to avoid decent people being summarily dismissed and having their work reputations trashed, while making sure that lazy people don&#8217;t exploit the rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Join Us For Our Partnership Law Manchester Homecoming by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/2011/04/07/join-us-for-our-partnership-law-manchester-homecoming/comment-page-1/#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/?p=839#comment-804</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post
         UK regulation limits by imposing a set of rules called aliens or immigration service checks before allowing non-British nationals. These laws are in place to set limits, including the duration of their stay, their purpose if they are allowed to ask their family to join them and if they could enjoy the many benefits of Britain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post<br />
         UK regulation limits by imposing a set of rules called aliens or immigration service checks before allowing non-British nationals. These laws are in place to set limits, including the duration of their stay, their purpose if they are allowed to ask their family to join them and if they could enjoy the many benefits of Britain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Andy Flower Is New Skin Cancer Charity Ambassador by Stephen Buckley</title>
		<link>http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/2011/07/12/andy-flower-is-new-skin-cancer-charity-ambassador/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Buckley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/?p=908#comment-799</guid>
		<description>A true legend supporting a great cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A true legend supporting a great cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop&#8230;Step Away From The Cookie Jar by Mark Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/2011/05/19/stop-step-away-from-the-cookie-jar/comment-page-1/#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 09:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/?p=869#comment-784</guid>
		<description>Shame the law is totally unworkable and neglects the fact that all web browsers block pop-up&#039;s by default. I wouldn&#039;t have the first clue about how we or several million other websites could make this work and most web systems are coded by third parties that don&#039;t take account of EU rules. A useless bit of legislation indeed.

Luckily there&#039;s no way they could enforce the rule upon any except the largest of commercial websites, the man-power and practical knowledge simply doesn&#039;t exist to go after millions of ordinary sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame the law is totally unworkable and neglects the fact that all web browsers block pop-up&#8217;s by default. I wouldn&#8217;t have the first clue about how we or several million other websites could make this work and most web systems are coded by third parties that don&#8217;t take account of EU rules. A useless bit of legislation indeed.</p>
<p>Luckily there&#8217;s no way they could enforce the rule upon any except the largest of commercial websites, the man-power and practical knowledge simply doesn&#8217;t exist to go after millions of ordinary sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Twitter Account On Everybody&#8217;s Lips @Injunctionsuper by Don</title>
		<link>http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/2011/05/09/the-twitter-account-on-everybodys-lips-superinjuction/comment-page-1/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 13:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/?p=861#comment-774</guid>
		<description>So if the twitter account is right the twitteror could be in trouble; but if it&#039;s a load of old rubbish nothing happens, except that a few lives of the twitterees may ne made very uncomfortable. What a fine legal system, still let&#039;s keep on deluding ourselves that it&#039;s the &#039;envy of the world&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if the twitter account is right the twitteror could be in trouble; but if it&#8217;s a load of old rubbish nothing happens, except that a few lives of the twitterees may ne made very uncomfortable. What a fine legal system, still let&#8217;s keep on deluding ourselves that it&#8217;s the &#8216;envy of the world&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Injured Parties Most Likely To Suffer Under &#8216;No-Win, No-Fee&#8217; Reforms by No win No fee Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/2011/03/29/injuried-parties-most-likely-to-suffer-under-no-win-no-fee-reforms/comment-page-1/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>No win No fee Lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/?p=814#comment-751</guid>
		<description>Your post was made just ahead of Ken Clarkes press release on the planned No win No fee crackdown.

Clarke got his sums wrong on clinical negligence (NHS) claims and frankly has got quite a few other things the wrong way round as well.

The best one can say is that he didnt fall asleep during the press briefing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post was made just ahead of Ken Clarkes press release on the planned No win No fee crackdown.</p>
<p>Clarke got his sums wrong on clinical negligence (NHS) claims and frankly has got quite a few other things the wrong way round as well.</p>
<p>The best one can say is that he didnt fall asleep during the press briefing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is it fair for Legal Expense Insurers to dictate who represents their customers? by Chris MacCafferty</title>
		<link>http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/2011/03/09/is-it-fair-for-legal-expense-insurers-to-dictate-who-represents-their-customers%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris MacCafferty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/?p=790#comment-746</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your posting Professional Negligence Lawyers. This part of Lord Justice Jackson&#039;s proposals certainly should improve the position; although it is not clear when any of the proposals will be put in place. In my view Lord Justice Jackson&#039;s proposal does not go far enough as he talks about cover at the point of sending a letter of claim. It is therefore unclear whether he means to include the investigation stage; which as you know can take a considerable length of time and money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your posting Professional Negligence Lawyers. This part of Lord Justice Jackson&#8217;s proposals certainly should improve the position; although it is not clear when any of the proposals will be put in place. In my view Lord Justice Jackson&#8217;s proposal does not go far enough as he talks about cover at the point of sending a letter of claim. It is therefore unclear whether he means to include the investigation stage; which as you know can take a considerable length of time and money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is it fair for Legal Expense Insurers to dictate who represents their customers? by Professional Negligence Lawyers</title>
		<link>http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/2011/03/09/is-it-fair-for-legal-expense-insurers-to-dictate-who-represents-their-customers%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-737</link>
		<dc:creator>Professional Negligence Lawyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/?p=790#comment-737</guid>
		<description>I also agree with the comments of Linda Lee, an individual who is involved in litigation should be entitled to a choice of lawyer. If Lord Justice Jackson&#039;s reforms are implemented, it will resolve all the issues discussed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree with the comments of Linda Lee, an individual who is involved in litigation should be entitled to a choice of lawyer. If Lord Justice Jackson&#8217;s reforms are implemented, it will resolve all the issues discussed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tunnel Vision? by George Street (Mr)</title>
		<link>http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/2011/01/31/tunnel-vision/comment-page-1/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>George Street (Mr)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 13:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/?p=745#comment-702</guid>
		<description>Slightly &#039;off piste&#039; - however: I&#039;m trying to find how many Judicial Reviews were held in 2010, does anyone know? Many thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slightly &#8216;off piste&#8217; &#8211; however: I&#8217;m trying to find how many Judicial Reviews were held in 2010, does anyone know? Many thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It doesn’t have to be that way by Ralli</title>
		<link>http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/2011/01/11/it-doesnt-have-to-be-that-way/comment-page-1/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralli.co.uk/blog/?p=667#comment-664</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your kind words. Your absolutely right about some Clients wanting ‘their day in court’; which is fine but a good strong lawyer should make them aware that it is not necessarily in their best interests. In my experience once a Client has gotten the issues off their chest they will, more often than not, take the sensible route of looking at alternatives.

Chris MacCafferty.  Ralli</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your kind words. Your absolutely right about some Clients wanting ‘their day in court’; which is fine but a good strong lawyer should make them aware that it is not necessarily in their best interests. In my experience once a Client has gotten the issues off their chest they will, more often than not, take the sensible route of looking at alternatives.</p>
<p>Chris MacCafferty.  Ralli</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

